In my point of view, article explains that heterosexuality and
homosexuality were a continuum. A number of studies have been published
over the past decade reporting that 5% or less of adolescents were aware
of homosexual feelings, a finding also inconsistent with Kinsey's data.
These studies have rejected prenatal hormones and rearing by homosexual
parents as influencing sexual orientation. If Kinsey's data are correct
and 40% or more of adolescents are aware of homosexual feeling the
findings of these studies are invalid. Two replications of an initial
study with representative samples of medical students found over 40% of
both males and females currently aware of some homosexual feelings,
consistent with Kinsey's conclusion. The ratio of reported homosexual to
heterosexual feelings correlated with opposite sex-linked behaviors in
the male, supporting the validity of the subjects' reports. If subjects
representative of other subgroups of the population are investigated
with this easily implemented method and report similar data, this
theoretically and sociologically significant divergence of belief
concerning the incidence of the heterosexual/homosexual balance would be
resolved.

I think labels like homosexual and heterosexual can be useful, but I
think we still have a lot of progress to make as far as some being more
acceptable than others. People should be able to label themselves as
homosexual if they want to without fear of being treated differently for
being so, and I think a lot of the gray area that exists between homo
and hetero exists as a result of that fear. The bad kind of gray area
where people can’t come to terms with their own sexual and emotional
needs, rather than the good kind of gray area that Michael Stipe seems
to know all about, where he realizes that labels can be irrelevant as
long as you are comfortable with who you are and what you want.
No comments:
Post a Comment